A framework for scientific computing with GPUs

Dissertação para obtenção do Grau de Mestre em Engenharia InformáticaCommodity hardware nowadays includes not only many-core CPUs but also Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) whose highly data-parallel computational capabilities have been growing at an exponential rate. This computational power can be used for purposes other than graphics-oriented applications, like processor-intensive algorithms as found in the scientific computing setting. This thesis proposes a framework that is capable of distributing computational jobs over a network of CPUs and GPUs alike. The source code for each job is an OpenCL kernel, and thus universal and independent from the specific architecture and CPU/GPU type where it will be executed. This approach releases the software developer from the burden of specific, customized revisions of the same applications for each type of processor/hardware, at the cost of a possibly sub-optimal but still very efficient solution. The proposed run-time scales up as more and more powerful computing resources become available, with no need to recompile the application. Experiments allowed to conclude that, although performance improvement achievements clearly depend on the nature of the problem and how it is coded, speedups in a distributed system containing both GPUs and multi-core CPUs can be up to two orders of magnitude.Centro de Informática e Tecnologias da Informação(CITI), and Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT/MCTES)- research projects PTDC/EIA/74325/2006, PTDC/EIA-EIA/108963/2008, PTDC/EIA-EIA /102579/2008, and PTDC/EIA-EIA/113613/200

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries